Documentation

DerivedAlgGeo.Algebra.Homology.Subcomplex

Subcomplexes from degreewise subobject data #

Neither Mathlib nor this repository has a way to build a subcomplex of a HomologicalComplex from a degreewise family of subobjects. Mathlib goes the other way — a mono of complexes is degreewise mono (HomologicalComplexLimits.lean) — and has the degreewise exactness criteria, but nothing assembles degreewise data into a complex.

This file supplies that. The point worth stating is how little is needed: given objects with monomorphisms into the ambient complex and differentials that commute with its own, both HomologicalComplex laws are automatic. shape and d_comp_d' are each proved by cancelling the mono in the next degree, so a caller supplies no coherence beyond the commuting squares.

Main definitions #

Why this exists #

Stacks 13.17.4 (tag 0FCL) — D⁻(𝓑) → D⁻_𝓑(𝓐) is an equivalence for a Serre subcategory 𝓑 ⊆ 𝓐 with the lifting property — is proved by a dévissage that constructs, by descending induction, subobjects E^i ⊂ X^i lying in 𝓑 and assembles them into a subcomplex quasi-isomorphic to the original. This is the assembly step of that argument, isolated because it is independent of 𝓑, of the Serre condition, and of the induction that produces the E^i.

Implementation notes #

The data is unbundled from Subobject: a family X with monos, rather than a family of Subobject (K.X i). The subobject-valued form needs the restriction condition as an inequality (Subobject.«exists» (K.d i j)).obj (S i) ≤ S j and then has to extract the differential from it; that is a further step, and this is the primitive it would be built on.

Degreewise subobject data for a complex K: an object in each degree, a monomorphism into K in each degree, and differentials commuting with those of K.

Instances For

    The subcomplex determined by degreewise subobject data.

    Neither complex law is a hypothesis: shape holds because d i j ≫ ι j factors through K.d i j = 0, and d_comp_d' because it factors through K.d i j ≫ K.d j k = 0. Both then follow by cancelling the monomorphism in the target degree.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The inclusion of the subcomplex into K.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The inclusion is a monomorphism of complexes, being one in each degree.

        K as a subcomplex of itself.

        Equations
        Instances For
          @[simp]
          @[simp]
          theorem HomologicalComplex.SubcomplexData.top_X {ι : Type u_1} {V : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} V] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive V] {c : ComplexShape ι} (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (a✝ : ι) :
          (top K).X a✝ = K.X a✝

          A degreewise monomorphism of complexes is subcomplex data.

          Stated with [∀ i, Mono (φ.f i)] rather than [Mono φ]: the two agree when the ambient category has finite limits (HomologicalComplex.mono_of_mono_f and its converse), but the degreewise form is what the construction uses and it needs no hypothesis on V.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[simp]
            theorem HomologicalComplex.SubcomplexData.ofDegreewiseMono_d {ι : Type u_1} {V : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} V] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive V] {c : ComplexShape ι} (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : L ⟶ K) [∀ (i : ι), CategoryTheory.Mono (φ.f i)] (i j : ι) :
            (ofDegreewiseMono K φ).d i j = L.d i j
            @[simp]
            @[simp]
            theorem HomologicalComplex.SubcomplexData.ofDegreewiseMono_X {ι : Type u_1} {V : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} V] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive V] {c : ComplexShape ι} (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : L ⟶ K) [∀ (i : ι), CategoryTheory.Mono (φ.f i)] (a✝ : ι) :
            (ofDegreewiseMono K φ).X a✝ = L.X a✝