The polarised wall transport, for every dimension and correction class #
CentralCharge/Exponential/ states the exponential charge once. This is the geometric side:
the map that turns a numerical class on a polarised variety into the compressed
H-degrees that the charge consumes, written once for every dimension n,
truncation degree m and correction class κ.
Before this the transport existed twice: Surface.toNumClass
(WallTransport.lean) at n = 2 and Threefold.toNumClass
(ThreefoldWallTransport.lean) at n = 3, the second a hand-copy of the first
at one more codimension. Both are proved below to be this map.
The rank slot carries ∫Hⁿ #
Slot k is ∫ H^(n-k) · (ch(E)·κ)_k, so the index is codimension and slot 0
is ∫Hⁿ · rk(E), not the bare rank. Both existing transports already did this
and said so in their docstrings, but nothing tied the convention to a root;
hDegrees_zero now does, in every dimension at once.
The weight is as easy to get wrong in the other direction. The slope μ_H is
not the ratio of slots d₁/d₀: that ratio is the slope divided by ∫Hⁿ.
slopeH_eq_degree_mul_ratio states the true relation, and
slopeH_ne_ratio_of_degree_ne_one records the false one as a negative result,
because the naive reading was written down during this lane's own design review
and is wrong on every polarization of degree other than one.
κ is a pullback, never a coefficient #
The correction class enters through corrComp, a convolution in the right-hand
slot, and nothing else here knows which class it is. Two values matter today:
unitCorr, giving the plain Chern character, and sqrtToddComp, giving the
Mukai vector. corrComp_sqrtToddComp is rfl, because
NumericalVarietyData.mukaiComp was already this convolution written out, so
the Mukai vector is not a second construction. The two are pullbacks of one
transport with genuinely different walls and must not be fused into one family.
What is proved about the existing families #
surface_toNumClass_eq and threefold_toNumClass_eq are the class-level
comparisons. surface_wallChargeFamily_eq is the family-level one, which is
the form a consumer actually needs: the existing surface wall family is this
root's family, reindexed by the surface chart.
The threefold family-level twin is deliberately absent. It needs a truncation map that does not exist yet, which belongs to the tilt slice; inventing a second route to it here is exactly what the tilt adjudication exists to stop.
(ch(E)·κ)_k, the codimension-k component of the corrected character.
The convolution is in the right-hand slot, which keeps κ a parameter rather
than a coefficient baked into the transport.
Equations
- AlgebraicGeometry.Numerical.Polarised.corrComp V κ E k = ∑ j ∈ Finset.range (k + 1), V.chComp E j * κ (k - j)
Instances For
With κ = 1 the convolution is the identity. This is the one fact both
dimension comparisons need, proved once instead of per dimension.
At κ = √td the convolution IS the Mukai component, by rfl.
The corrected character is additive, because the Chern character is.
The compressed H-degree vector, d k = ∫ H^(n-k) · (ch(E)·κ)_k for
k ≤ m. One map for every (n, m, κ).
Equations
- AlgebraicGeometry.Numerical.Polarised.hDegrees V P κ m E k = ↑(V.ring.degree (AlgebraicGeometry.Numerical.Polarised.corrComp V κ E ↑k * P.cls ^ (n - ↑k)))
Instances For
The transport is additive.
The transport bundled as an additive map, which is what pullback needs.
Equations
Instances For
The wall family of a polarised variety: the kernel's family pulled back along the transport. Every dimension and every correction class gets its walls from here rather than from a charge of its own.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The root family evaluates as the kernel on the transported degrees. The
accessor the surface leaf has had since WallTransport.lean:161; a consumer
that unfolds pullback by hand is reaching past this definition.
PROVED. Slot 0 is ∫Hⁿ · rank E.
###########################################################################
(3) N4 — the honest relation between slopeH and the root's slots.
slopeH (Slope.lean:133) is degH / rank, while slot 0 is rank · ∫Hⁿ.
So the ratio d₁ / d₀ is NOT the slope: it is the slope divided by ∫Hⁿ.
###########################################################################
Slot 1 of the root is degH, in every dimension n ≥ 1.
N4, corrected and proved. μ_H(E) = ∫Hⁿ · (d₁ / d₀).
The report's §2.6 reading slopeH = d₁ / d₀ is FALSE whenever ∫Hⁿ ≠ 1: the
rank slot carries the ∫Hⁿ weight, so the ratio of the root's slots is the
slope scaled down by ∫Hⁿ. Note there is no rank hypothesis — at rank E = 0
both sides are Lean's junk 0, which is the same junk slopeH already has.
The falsified reading, recorded as a negative result. slopeH = d₁/d₀
holds exactly when ∫Hⁿ = 1 (or the slope is zero); it is not an identity.