The signature is additive over an orthogonal decomposition #
Mathlib at the pin has Sylvester's law of inertia — sigPos, sigNeg, and
sigPos_add_sigNeg_add_radical — but not the additivity of the signature over an
orthogonal direct sum. This file supplies it for a nondegenerate orthogonal
decomposition of a finite-dimensional real quadratic space.
It is what turns a signature hypothesis on a summand into one on the whole
space: the Mukai extension is a hyperbolic plane orthogonal to V, so the
(2, n - 2) signature the period domain assumes should follow from the
(1, n - 1) signature of V rather than being asserted.
The proof, which is a squeeze rather than a construction #
Only the easy direction is proved directly, twice:
- a positive definite subspace of
Wand one ofW'span a positive definite subspace ofM, because the cross terms vanish — sosigPos (Q|W) + sigPos (Q|W') ≤ sigPos Q; - the same for
-Q, which issigNeg.
Then sigPos_add_sigNeg_add_radical on all three spaces, with the radicals
trivial, gives
finrank M = sigPos Q + sigNeg Q ≥ (sigPos₁ + sigPos₂) + (sigNeg₁ + sigNeg₂)
= finrank W + finrank W' = finrank M,
so both inequalities are equalities. The hard direction — bounding an arbitrary
positive definite subspace of M — is never needed.
Scope #
The restrictions are assumed nondegenerate, which is the case the application
has and which keeps the counting to two terms. The degenerate version follows the
same squeeze with the radical as a third term and a third inequality
finrank (radical Q|W) + finrank (radical Q|W') ≤ finrank (radical Q); it is not
proved here because nothing needs it.
The easy half of additivity for sigPos.
The easy half of additivity for sigNeg, which is sigPos of -Q.
An orthogonal decomposition into nondegenerate pieces is nondegenerate.
The signature is additive over a nondegenerate orthogonal decomposition.
Definite forms and their indices of inertia #
Sylvester's law pins the two indices for a definite form. Mathlib has the
defining maximality property of sigPos and the counting identity, but not the
two corollaries every consumer wants, so they are proved here beside the
additivity they are used with.
An anisotropic form is nondegenerate: the radical sits inside the zero locus.
A negative definite form has sigNeg = dim and sigPos = 0.
"Negative definite" is spelled the way sigNeg is defined, as positive
definiteness of -Q.
A form of full negative index is negative definite. The converse of
sigNeg_eq_finrank_of_negDef: a negative definite subspace of full dimension is
the whole space.
Restricting a nondegenerate form to an orthogonal summand #
A summand of a nondegenerate orthogonal decomposition is nondegenerate.
This is the converse direction of nondegenerate_of_isCompl: a class of the
radical of one summand is orthogonal to that summand by definition and to the
other by hypothesis, hence to everything.